Monday, 25 December 2017 08:03

LỄ TRAO HỌC BỔNG DAIKIN VÀ HỘI THẢO CHUYÊN ĐỀ VRV HOT WATER

Written by 
Rate this item
(0 votes)

    Sáng ngày 28 tháng 10 năm 2017 tại Hội trường A4 - Trường Đại học Bách Khoa, ĐHQG- HCM, Bộ môn Công nghệ Nhiệt lạnh đã phối hợp với Công ty Cổ phần Daikin Air Conditioning Việt Nam (gọi tắt là Công ty Daikin Việt Nam) tổ chức lễ trao học bổng Daikin và hội thảo chuyên đề Máy nén trục vít biến tần của Daikin với công nghệ VVR.


Tham dự buổi lễ, về phía Công ty Daikin Việt Nam có Bà Lý Thị Phương Trang - Tổng Giám đốc Công ty cùng một số cán bộ và kỹ sư đang công tác tại Công ty. Về phía Bộ Môn Công nghệ Nhiệt lạnh có GS.TS. Lê Chí Hiệp, Chủ nhiệm Bộ môn cùng với các Thầy Cô và các bạn sinh viên ngành Kỹ thuật Nhiệt.
    Trong buổi lễ, 15 em sinh viên ngành Kỹ thuật Nhiệt các khóa 2013 - 2016 có thành tích học tập tốt và vượt khó đã vinh dự được Công ty Daikin Việt Nam trao tặng học bổng với tổng giá trị là 60.000.000 đồng (Sáu mươi triệu đồng). Các phần học bổng này không những có ý nghĩa về mặt vật chất, mà còn là nguồn động viên tinh thần học tập và nghiên cứu cho các em sinh viên.
    Phát biểu tại hội thảo bà Lý Thị Phương Trang, Tổng Giám Công ty Daikin Việt Nam cho biết phần lớn các kỹ sư và cán bộ chủ chốt của Công ty là cựu sinh viên nghành Kỹ thuật Nhiệt của Trường Đại học Bách Khoa, ĐHQG- HCM và bày tỏ mong muốn trong thời gian tới Công ty Cổ phần Daikin Air Conditioning Việt Nam sẽ vẫn là bến đậu tương lai cho cho nhiều sinh viên tài năng.
    Thông qua buổi Hội thảo, Công ty Daikin Việt Nam đã giới thiệu công nghệ Máy nén trục vít biến tần của Daikin với công nghệ VVR mà Công ty đang phát triển trên thị trường. Với công nghệ máy nén VVR, hệ thống chiller mang lại hiệu suất năng lượng cao nhất và cho phép làm thế nào để cung cấp tải tối ưu cho không gian điều hoà, qua đó làm giảm tối đa chi phí hoạt động của hệ thống. 
    Bên cạnh đó, Công ty cũng đã giới thiệu cơ hôi nghề nghiệp tại Công ty Cổ phần Daikin Air Conditioning Việt Nam. Trả lời câu hỏi về cơ hội thực tập tại Daikin Bà Phạm Thị Thu Hương – chuyên viên nhân sự của Công ty bày tỏ sự sẵn sàng của phía công ty về việc tiếp nhận các em sinh viên đến thực tập và tạo cơ hội cho các em tiếp cận công nghệ mới và môi trường làm việc năng động, sáng tạo.
    Phát biểu tại hội thảo GS.TS. Lê Chí Hiệp trân trọng cảm ơn Công ty Daikin Việt Nam đã giới thiệu công nghệ mới cũng như cơ hôi nghề nghiệp cho các em sinh viên. Bộ môn Công nghệ Nhiệt lạnh sẽ tiếp tục đồng hành cùng Công ty Cổ phần Daikin Air Conditioning Việt Nam để cùng hợp tác nghiên cứu, đào tạo và phát triển công nghệ trong thời gian tới.

Một số hình ảnh về buổi lễ:

Poster giới thiệu buổi hội thảo và trao học bổng cho sinh viên Nhiệt lạnh của công ty Daikin

Toàn cảnh hội trường buổi lễ

Trao đổi trước buổi lễ giữa thầy GS.TS Lê Chí Hiệp (Trưởng Bộ môn) và Bà Lý Thị Phương Trang (Tổng giám đốc công ty Daikin)

Đại diện Bộ môn và công ty DAIKIN phát biểu khai mạc buổi lễ

Chương trình văn nghệ

Đại diện Bộ môn Công Nghệ Nhiệt Lạnh và Công ty Cổ phần Daikin Air Conditioning trao học bổng cho các em sinh viên.

Đại diện các em sinh viên được nhận học bổng phát biểu cảm ơn quý Công ty

Đại diện công ty DAIKIN giải đáp thắc mắc cho các em sinh viên trong hội thảo về công nghệ VVR cũng như cơ hội nghề nghiệp tại công ty 

Read 25833357 times Last modified on Monday, 25 December 2017 08:36

579674 comments

  • Comment Link MosesAlunk Wednesday, 29 January 2025 01:55 posted by MosesAlunk

    The survivors of recent crashes were sitting at the back of the plane. What does that tell us about airplane safety?
    kraken darknet onion

    Look at the photos of the two fatal air crashes of the last two weeks, and amid the horror and the anguish, one thought might come to mind for frequent flyers.

    The old frequent-flyer adage is that sitting at the back of the plane is a safer place to be than at the front — and the wreckage of both Azerbaijan Airlines flight 8243 and Jeju Air flight 2216 seem to bear that out.
    https://kra26c.cc
    kraken войти
    The 29 survivors of the Azeri crash were all sitting at the back of the plane, which split into two, leaving the rear half largely intact. The sole survivors of the South Korean crash, meanwhile, were the two flight attendants in their jumpseats in the very tail of the plane.

    So is that old adage — and the dark humor jokes about first and business class seats being good until there’s a problem with the plane — right after all?

    In 2015, TIME Magazine reporters wrote that they had combed through the records of all US plane crashes with both fatalities and survivors from 1985 to 2000, and found in a meta-analysis that seats in the back third of the aircraft had a 32% fatality rate overall, compared with 38% in the front third and 39% in the middle third.

    Even better, they found, were middle seats in that back third of the cabin, with a 28% fatality rate. The “worst” seats were aisles in the middle third of the aircraft, with a 44% fatality rate.
    But does that still hold true in 2024?

    According to aviation safety experts, it’s an old wives’ tale.

    “There isn’t any data that shows a correlation of seating to survivability,” says Hassan Shahidi, president of the Flight Safety Foundation. “Every accident is different.”

    “If we’re talking about a fatal crash, then there is almost no difference where one sits,” says Cheng-Lung Wu, associate professor at the School of Aviation of the University of New South Wales, Sydney.

    Ed Galea, professor of fire safety engineering at London’s University of Greenwich, who has conducted landmark studies on plane crash evacuations, warns, “There is no magic safest seat.”

  • Comment Link EugenevaX Wednesday, 29 January 2025 01:30 posted by EugenevaX

    The survivors of recent crashes were sitting at the back of the plane. What does that tell us about airplane safety?
    kraken магазин

    Look at the photos of the two fatal air crashes of the last two weeks, and amid the horror and the anguish, one thought might come to mind for frequent flyers.

    The old frequent-flyer adage is that sitting at the back of the plane is a safer place to be than at the front — and the wreckage of both Azerbaijan Airlines flight 8243 and Jeju Air flight 2216 seem to bear that out.
    https://kra26c.cc
    Џлощадка кракен
    The 29 survivors of the Azeri crash were all sitting at the back of the plane, which split into two, leaving the rear half largely intact. The sole survivors of the South Korean crash, meanwhile, were the two flight attendants in their jumpseats in the very tail of the plane.

    So is that old adage — and the dark humor jokes about first and business class seats being good until there’s a problem with the plane — right after all?

    In 2015, TIME Magazine reporters wrote that they had combed through the records of all US plane crashes with both fatalities and survivors from 1985 to 2000, and found in a meta-analysis that seats in the back third of the aircraft had a 32% fatality rate overall, compared with 38% in the front third and 39% in the middle third.

    Even better, they found, were middle seats in that back third of the cabin, with a 28% fatality rate. The “worst” seats were aisles in the middle third of the aircraft, with a 44% fatality rate.
    But does that still hold true in 2024?

    According to aviation safety experts, it’s an old wives’ tale.

    “There isn’t any data that shows a correlation of seating to survivability,” says Hassan Shahidi, president of the Flight Safety Foundation. “Every accident is different.”

    “If we’re talking about a fatal crash, then there is almost no difference where one sits,” says Cheng-Lung Wu, associate professor at the School of Aviation of the University of New South Wales, Sydney.

    Ed Galea, professor of fire safety engineering at London’s University of Greenwich, who has conducted landmark studies on plane crash evacuations, warns, “There is no magic safest seat.”

  • Comment Link Sazrizb Wednesday, 29 January 2025 01:18 posted by Sazrizb

    сколько стоит диплом купить

  • Comment Link Forrestsoida Wednesday, 29 January 2025 01:00 posted by Forrestsoida

    What’s on board this flight
    Blue Origin had planned to launch a pair of Mars-bound satellites on behalf of NASA for the first flight of New Glenn.

    But delays with the rocket’s development prompted the space agency to change course, moving that flight to this spring at the earliest. So for this inaugural flight, Blue Origin opted to instead fly a “demonstrator” that will test technology needed for the company’s proposed Blue Ring spacecraft — which will aim to serve as a sort of in-space rideshare vehicle, dragging satellites deeper into space when needed.
    omg зайти
    The demonstrator on this New Glenn flight will remain aboard the rocket for the entire six-hour flight, Blue Origin said, and it will validate “communications capabilities from orbit to ground” as well as “test its in-space telemetry, tracking and command hardware, and ground-based radiometric tracking.”

    The Blue Ring Pathfinder demonstrator is part of a deal Blue Origin inked with the US Department of Defense’s Defense Innovation Unit.
    https://omgprice10.com
    площадка omg
    Why Blue Origin wants to reuse rockets
    Similar to SpaceX, Blue Origin is aiming to recover and refly its first-stage rocket boosters in a bid to make launches less expensive.

    “Reusability is integral to radically reducing cost-per-launch,” the company said in a recent news release, using the same oft-repeated sentiment that SpaceX has touted since it began landing rocket boosters in 2015.
    Bezos, however, has acknowledged the importance of reusing rocket parts since he founded the company in 2000 — two years before Musk established SpaceX. And the company has already developed its suborbital New Shepard tourism rocket to be reusable.
    “It’s not a copy cat game,” Henry said. “Blue Origin has been pursuing reusable vehicles since before reusable vehicles were cool. Now it’s much more of a mainstream idea (because of SpaceX). The difference is that it’s taken Blue Origin so much longer to get to orbit.”

    If successful, returning the New Glenn rocket booster for a safe landing will be a stunning feat. After expending most of its fuel to propel the rocket’s upper stage to space, the first-stage booster will need to make a clean separation. The booster must then maneuver with pinpoint guidance and reignite its engines with precision timing to avoid crashing into the ocean or the Jacklyn recovery platform.

  • Comment Link Diplomi_gvsl Wednesday, 29 January 2025 00:43 posted by Diplomi_gvsl

    купить диплом мгу в смоленске prema-diploms.ru .

  • Comment Link GeorgeSoigh Wednesday, 29 January 2025 00:02 posted by GeorgeSoigh

    megaweb14.at - m3ga, ссылка мега

  • Comment Link indo porn Tuesday, 28 January 2025 23:35 posted by indo porn

    This piece of writing offers clear idea in support of the new people of
    blogging, that in fact how to do blogging and site-building.

  • Comment Link Matthewhooma Tuesday, 28 January 2025 23:12 posted by Matthewhooma

    A year ago today, things went from bad to worse for Boeing
    kra26 cc

    At 5 p.m. PT on January 5, 2024, Boeing seemed like a company on the upswing. It didn’t last. Minutes later, a near-tragedy set off a full year of problems.

    As Alaska Airlines flight 1282 climbed to 16,000 feet in its departure from Portland, Oregon, a door plug blew out near the rear of the plane, leaving a gaping hole in the fuselage. Phones and clothing were ripped away from passengers and sent hurtling into the night sky. Oxygen masks dropped, and the rush of air twisted seats next to the hole toward the opening.
    https://kra26c.cc
    кракен
    Fortunately, those were among the few empty seats on the flight, and the crew got the plane on the ground without any serious injuries. The incident could have been far worse — even a fatal crash.

    Not much has gone right for Boeing ever since. The company has had one misstep after another, ranging from embarrassing to horrifying. And many of the problems are poised to extend into 2025 and perhaps beyond.

    The problems were capped by another Boeing crash in South Korea that killed 179 people on December 29 in what was in the year’s worst aviation disaster. The cause of the crash of a 15-year old Boeing jet flown by Korean discount carrier Jeju Air is still under investigation, and it is quite possible that Boeing will not be found liable for anything that led to the tragedy.
    But unlike the Jeju crash, most of the problems of the last 12 months have clearly been Boeing’s fault.

    And 2024 was the sixth straight year of serious problems for the once proud, now embattled company, starting with the 20-month grounding of its best selling plane, the 737 Max, following two fatal crashes in late 2018 and early 2019, which killed 346 people.

    Still the outlook for 2024 right before the Alaska Air incident had been somewhat promising. The company had just achieved the best sales month in its history in December 2023, capping its strongest sales year since 2018.

    It was believed to be on the verge of getting Federal Aviation Administration approval for two new models, the 737 Max 7 and Max 10, with airline customers eager to take delivery. Approvals and deliveries of its next generation widebody, the 777X, were believed to be close behind. Its production rate had been climbing and there were hopes that it could be on the verge of returning to profitability for the first time since 2018.

  • Comment Link dostavka_alcogolya_na_dom_ftPn Tuesday, 28 January 2025 22:56 posted by dostavka_alcogolya_na_dom_ftPn

    Онлайн-доставка алкоголя: широкий выбор и качественное обслуживание
    заказать алкоголь с доставкой москва https://www.dostavka-alcogolya-nochyu-club.ru/ .

  • Comment Link 정성의 길대사 Tuesday, 28 January 2025 22:25 posted by 정성의 길대사

    Pretty great post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I have really loved surfing around your blog posts.
    After all I will be subscribing in your feed and I am hoping you write once more soon!

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter the (*) required information where indicated. HTML code is not allowed.

Department of Heat & Refrigeration Engineering

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering

Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology - VNU

Address: Building B5, 268 Ly Thuong Kiet street, District 10, Hochiminh City, Vietnam

Phone:+84 .028.38 647 256 ext.5897

Email: cnnhietlanh@hcmut.edu.vn

Facebook: Nhiệt lạnh ĐHBK HCM

33037401
Hôm nay
Tổng cộng
2306
33037401

Facebook

Joomla Templates - by Joomlage.com